Coppola’s ‘Megalopolis’: A cinematic journey through time
A new trailer with a twist
When Lionsgate unveiled the second trailer for Francis Ford Coppola‘s epic film Megalopolis on Wednesday morning, it began with a surprising twist. The trailer showcased a series of critical quotes from renowned reviewers, seemingly panning Coppola’s past masterpieces like The Godfather and Apocalypse Now. The intention was clear: to position Megalopolis as a misunderstood work of art that, like its predecessors, will stand the test of time.
The controversy behind the quotes
However, there’s a significant issue with the trailer’s narrative. The quotes attributed to critics such as Pauline Kael, Andrew Sarris, and Roger Ebert don’t actually appear in their original reviews. This discrepancy was pointed out by several sources and verified by multiple outlets. For instance, Ebert’s supposed critique of Dracula as a “triumph of style over substance” was actually from his 1989 review of Batman.
The critics’ real opinions
Owen Gleiberman, who was misquoted in the trailer, expressed his frustration, stating, “Even if you’re one of those people who don’t like critics, we hardly deserve to have words put in our mouths.” He emphasized that critics genuinely loved The Godfather, and while Apocalypse Now was divisive, it received substantial critical support. Gleiberman humorously added that he wished he had called Bram Stoker’s Dracula “a beautiful mess.”
The legacy of Coppola’s films
Despite the trailer’s misleading quotes, some critics did indeed have harsh words for Coppola’s early works. Rex Reed famously described Apocalypse Now as a “gumbo of pretentious twaddle.” Yet, these films have undeniably cemented their place in cinematic history, proving that initial critical reception doesn’t always predict a film’s lasting impact.
The potential of ‘Megalopolis’
Megalopolis premiered at Cannes and faced mixed reviews, with some critics dismissing it as indulgent and muddled. However, the new trailer aims to reframe the film as a future classic. Peter Debruge had a negative reaction, describing it as a “deeply personal, but sloppy allegory on [Coppola’s] relationship to art.” He added that world-building, a crucial element in modern Hollywood franchises, might not be Coppola’s strength.
Reflecting on the art of cinema
As a cinema enthusiast, it’s fascinating to see how films can evolve in public perception over time. Coppola’s works, often initially divisive, have become cornerstones of film history. This raises an intriguing question: will Megalopolis follow the same path? Only time will tell.
Explore more
For those interested in diving deeper into Coppola’s latest work, you can watch the trailer for Megalopolis and explore its themes and visuals firsthand.
The broader context of film criticism
This controversy also highlights the complex relationship between filmmakers and critics. While critics play a crucial role in shaping public opinion, their initial reactions don’t always align with a film’s long-term legacy. This dynamic is a testament to the ever-evolving nature of art and its interpretation.
Final thoughts
Megalopolis represents more than just a film; it’s a reflection of Coppola’s enduring passion for storytelling and his willingness to take risks. Whether it will be celebrated as a masterpiece or remain a polarizing work, it undeniably adds another layer to Coppola’s rich cinematic tapestry.
For those eager to explore more about Coppola’s filmography, check out the trailers for his iconic films like The Godfather and Apocalypse Now.
By weaving personal reflections and in-depth analysis into the narrative, this article aims to provide a comprehensive and engaging perspective on Coppola’s Megalopolis and its place in the broader context of cinema.